I’m not sure if Steam requires the ‘always on’ connection, but you’re still ‘buying’ games that you don’t really own, and that can be ‘switched off’ at somebody else’s discretion. Then it’s sort of like a rental Since games are only entertainment, I can easily live without them.Īnd I also think it’s a bit hypocritical for people to shun this kind of DRM on one hand, and embrace Steam on the other. If I can’t really own the games, I’m just not interested, unless maybe they’re having a fire sale for like $10.
SIMCITY 5 EXPANSION PC
Assuming their PC games are being pirated to the point where they would have to go out of business if they didn’t resort to this model, then I’d rather see them go out of business. So I understand the business reasons why they’re doing it, and I understand this is the future.ĭo I AGREE with it? No.
SIMCITY 5 EXPANSION CODE
The main argument against this kind of DRM is that you can never make something that can’t be cracked, but as more and more of the code goes server-side, I’m sure they will eventually make something that’s uncrackable, assuming they haven’t already. Hello? WTF did you think was going to happen? They’re not just going to sit back and watch while you play $60 games for free. I’m sorry guys, but piracy does NOT help the industry You get hundreds of thousands of people torrenting games, and then you wonder why publishers resort to the online-only DRM. I’m sure they’re getting tired of people pirating their stuff, while at the same time you have a bunch of f–ktards screaming about how piracy helps the industry. Don’t get me wrong… I would never support this model for games, but I don’t blame them for doing it. Yep, that’s pretty much it, and I think it’s a justifiable reason on their part. How long will it be before Toyota says, “if you take your car anywhere but the dealership for regular maintenance – which is mandatory – your car will lock up and you can’t drive it anymore”… and we shrug our shoulders?ĮA breaks games with DRM, removes features til it’s working again: “Oh well, they’re just trying to keep people from stealing their stuff” And if they then turn around and say, “I appear to have broken your nose… here, have this fake nose to wear over it so you look normal again”, I should not accept that as adequate.Īmazon DRM-ing public works, the walled gardens of the smartphone market – now creeping into the PC market, long-term service contracts that are entirely one-sided, etc. If someone elbows me in the face while trying to throw a hay-maker at a guy next to me, I’m still justified to be pissed as hell. That’s their f**king problem, not yours you as a loyal paying customer shouldn’t be suffering for it. How is that not viewed as wrong? If a Frigidaire rep breaks into my house and removes the ice dispenser on my fridge that I never use, is it excusable?ĮA breaks games with DRM, removes features til it’s working again: “Oh well, they’re just trying to keep people from stealing their stuff”. They took something away from you AFTER you purchased it. Sony removes Other OS support, backwards compatibility, etc.: “Oh well, I never used it anyway”. take actions against their customers and half the time the customers shrug or even applaud them for it. You see big companies like Sony, EA, Microsoft, etc.
This and things like this are the sad trend we’re seeing in the marketplace.